$10M+ in risk adjustment improvements. 90%+ diagnosis accuracy. 20,000+ patients across 7 states with 245 providers.
Risk adjustment determines how you get paid in Medicare Advantage, ACO REACH, and value-based contracts. Accurate HCC coding isn't just about revenue-it's about getting reimbursed appropriately for the patients you actually serve.
Assess Your RAF OpportunityRisk Adjustment Improvements
Diagnosis Accuracy
Patients Served
States in Production
The Risk Adjustment Factor (RAF) is CMS's way of adjusting payments based on how sick your patients are. Sicker patients with more chronic conditions get higher RAF scores, which means higher payments to cover their expected costs.
Hierarchical Condition Categories (HCCs) are the diagnosis groupings that drive your RAF score. Each HCC has a specific coefficient-conditions like diabetes with complications, heart failure, and COPD add to your RAF and increase your payment.
The key: HCCs must be documented and coded annually. A patient with diabetes last year doesn't automatically count this year-the condition must be documented in the current measurement period. That's where most organizations leave money on the table.
Medicare Advantage
MA plans receive capitated payments based on member RAF scores. Under-coded members mean you're paid less than required to care for them.
ACO REACH
Risk adjustment determines your benchmark. Low RAF scores mean artificially low targets-making shared savings harder to achieve.
Value-Based Contracts
Commercial payers increasingly use risk adjustment. Accurate coding ensures fair payment for the complexity you manage.
Every missed HCC is money left on the table-and inaccurate risk representation to payers.
Known chronic conditions documented in prior years often don't get re-documented annually. Diabetes, heart failure, COPD-conditions don't resolve, but documentation gaps make them invisible to risk adjustment.
Clinical evidence suggests conditions that were never formally diagnosed. Medications, lab values, and symptoms point to HCCs hiding in plain sight.
Annual revenue impact of accurate vs. incomplete RAF coding. For a 10,000-patient population, that's $50M-$150M in risk adjustment accuracy at stake.
Annual Recapture Requirement
HCCs must be documented every measurement year. A diabetic patient from 2024 needs 2025 documentation to count toward 2025 RAF-regardless of how chronic the condition is.
Provider Cognitive Load
Primary care physicians manage 15-25 patients daily with 10-15 chronic conditions each. Remembering which HCCs need documentation is impossible without system support.
Specificity Requirements
Generic diagnosis codes often miss HCC opportunities. "Diabetes" isn't enough-the type and complications must be specified for proper risk adjustment.
Audit Exposure
CMS audits risk adjustment accuracy. Over-coding creates compliance risk; under-coding leaves money on the table. You need accuracy, not just volume.
We built our RAF optimization platform using peer-reviewed CMS methodologies and clinical NLP. Every recommendation links to source documentation-creating audit-defensible accuracy, not black-box suggestions.
Our system continuously monitors for known HCCs from prior years that need current-year documentation. It alerts providers before visits, identifies documentation gaps, and tracks recapture status across your entire population.
Example: "Patient has HCC 18 (Diabetes with Chronic Complications) from 2024. No 2025 documentation found. Recommend addressing at upcoming visit."
AI analyzes medications, lab results, and clinical notes to identify conditions that may be present but never formally diagnosed. Every suspicion includes supporting evidence for clinical review.
Example: "Patient on Metformin + Glipizide with A1C of 8.2%-no diabetes diagnosis coded. Consider HCC 19 evaluation."
Generic codes often miss HCC opportunities. Our system identifies where diagnosis specificity could improve risk adjustment accuracy-differentiating between types, complications, and severity levels.
Example: "E11.9 (Type 2 Diabetes without complications) coded, but neuropathy symptoms documented. Consider E11.42 for HCC 18."
Every AI recommendation links directly to supporting documentation-labs, notes, medication lists. This creates an audit trail that protects your revenue while ensuring clinical accuracy.
Result: 90%+ diagnosis accuracy with full documentation linkage for CMS audit defense.
Our RAF optimization isn't a black box. We use peer-reviewed CMS scoring models and clinical NLP trained on millions of healthcare documents. Every recommendation is explainable-you can see exactly why the AI flagged a condition.
This explainability matters for three reasons: clinicians trust it, auditors accept it, and you can validate accuracy before acting on recommendations.
The result: 90%+ diagnosis accuracy across 20,000+ patients, with documentation linkage that stands up to CMS scrutiny.
CMS HCC Model V28: Current risk adjustment methodology with proper coefficient mapping
Clinical NLP: Trained on millions of healthcare documents for condition extraction
Multi-Source Integration: EHR, claims, labs, medications-holistic patient view
Confidence Scoring: Each recommendation includes confidence level and supporting evidence strength
Audit Trail: Complete documentation linkage for every flagged condition
Production deployment at scale. Not a pilot. Not a projection. Real results from value-based care organizations managing real patient populations.
Multi-state value-based care organization managing Medicare Advantage and ACO REACH populations. They needed RAF optimization that could scale across 245 providers while maintaining audit-ready accuracy.
Improved annual recapture of known chronic conditions from 60-65% to 85-90%-closing the documentation gap.
Identified 15-20% additional HCC opportunities from clinical evidence that hadn't been formally diagnosed.
Documentation linkage and explainability enabled confident audit defense with minimal findings.
Our RAF platform integrates with the EHR systems value-based care organizations actually use. We pull clinical documentation, labs, medications, and claims data-creating a holistic patient view that manual review can't match.
Recommendations flow back into provider workflows at the point of care. Alerts before visits, embedded decision support during documentation, and tracking dashboards for population management.
For organizations with multiple EHRs across their network, we handle the complexity-normalizing data from different sources into unified RAF insights.
PointClickCare
Primary SNF/PAC integration for long-term care populations
Gehrimed
Post-acute care physician practice management
Acclivity
Healthcare software platform integration
Claims Data
Integration with CMS claims for prior-year HCC history
Lab Systems
Direct lab result integration for clinical evidence
RAF accuracy directly impacts VBC benchmarks and ACO REACH performance targets.
Learn more →MDS assessments and HCC coding target the same chronic conditions. Unified approach maximizes capture.
Learn more →Better clinical documentation creates the evidence RAF optimization needs.
Learn more →AI scribes capture diagnoses and clinical detail that improve HCC code specificity.
Learn more →Accurate risk adjustment feeds directly into claims and reimbursement optimization.
Learn more →30-minute call. We'll assess your RAF opportunity based on population size, current recapture rates, and payer mix.
Assess Your RAF OpportunityOr call: 404.654.3855
Related Insights
Feb 19, 2025
Dec 12, 2023
Nov 28, 2025