X
Dev Shops
Write code, throw it over the wall. No healthcare expertise. No implementation support. No accountability for results.
X
AI Vendors
Sell tools, wish you luck. Built for demos, not your EHR. No integration, no adoption support, no workflow fit.
X
Consultants
Advise forever, never transfer knowledge. Strategy without delivery. Beautiful decks that never become working software.
X
Offshore Vendors
Build cheap, miss compliance. Timezone gaps, quality issues, HIPAA concerns. No on-site discovery possible.
MIT Project NANDA Research, July 2025
“Despite $30–40 billion in enterprise AI investment, 95% of organizations are getting zero return.”
Why pilots stall: “Most fail due to brittle workflows, lack of contextual learning, and misalignment with day-to-day operations.”
What a CIO told researchers: “We've seen dozens of demos this year. Maybe one or two are genuinely useful. The rest are wrappers or science projects.”
Partners outperform internal builds 2:1. “Pilots built via strategic partnerships were 2x as likely to reach full deployment as those built internally. Employee usage rates were nearly double for externally built tools.”
What enterprises want: “Deep understanding of our workflow. Minimal disruption to current tools. The ability to improve over time.”
We’ve been building with AI for over 10 years. We’re exactly the kind of partner MIT’s research says you need—one team, concept to scale.
Start a conversation →
Source: "The GenAI Divide: State of AI in Business 2025", MIT NANDA — Challapally, Pease, Raskar, Chari. Based on 300+ public AI initiatives, 52 org interviews, 153 senior leader surveys.
