Implementing AI
in the Real World
Worksheet

AI Workflow Opportunity Scorecard

Screen your candidate workflows, pick the one to put AI on first, then size the annual value across cost, throughput, and quality.

Two parts. First screen your candidates to decide whether to start. Then size the winner to find out what it is worth, so you can take a real number to your leadership team.

Part 1 · Screen the candidates

List up to three candidate workflows. Score each test from 1 (weak) to 5 (strong).

A strong first workflow scores 20 or higher out of 25, and never scores low on "contained downside." A high total with a risky downside is not a first project.
TestABC
Manual load. People spend real hours on it today.
Clear return. Doing it faster or better moves money, risk, or capacity.
Contained downside. If the system is wrong, it is only a recommendation a person can override.
Few integrations. You can start from one or two inputs.
Visible win. The team can see it working in weeks, not quarters.
Total (out of 25)

Part 2 · Size the business case

Improvement shows up in three places: cost, throughput, and quality. This is a small business case to actually do something, so size each one and total it. Hand this to whoever owns the numbers. They fill the right-hand column, on paper or in a spreadsheet, using the formula next to each line.

Keep it real. Use conservative numbers you can defend in the room. A believable business case beats an impressive one.
MeasureHow to get itYour number
Baseline · the work today
Volumeitems per week
Time per item todayminutes
Fully-loaded labor costdollars per hour
Hours spent per weekvolume × minutes ÷ 60
Labor cost per yearhours per week × rate × 52
Cost · the same work, in less time
Time reduction with AIpercent of the manual time
Labor cost saved per yearlabor cost per year × reduction
Throughput · handle more, or win more
Extra items per weeksame team handles more, or you win more by responding faster
Value per itemdollars
Throughput value per yearextra items × value × 52
Quality · fewer errors, more consistency
Cost of errors and rework todaydollars per year
Reduction in that costpercent
Quality value per yearerror cost × reduction
The business case
Estimated annual valuecost saved + throughput + quality
First project costdollars, one time
Annual run costdollars per year
Simple payback, in monthsfirst project cost ÷ ((annual value - run cost) ÷ 12)
Want a second read on this? Set up a conversation. We will map your highest-opportunity workflow with you, free.
Bob Klein, CEO · Digital Scientists
[email protected]
digitalscientists.com